W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2010

Re: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <1200994488.221461.1274280967855.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> I'd also like to note that some of the objections to Shelley's
> proposal 
> do not seem to be relevant; for instance, whether or not the 
> "superfriends" support an element isn't very interesting to me, unless
> they care to come over and argue within the WG.

On the topic of the strength of objections: Larry's concern about progress to REC could be used as an excuse to delete anything proactively. However, we don't need to because the Process already involves pruning features without implementations before in later transitions before REC.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:57:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:17 UTC