W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:09:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4C23C978.6060702@intertwingly.net>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On 06/24/2010 05:07 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Sam Ruby, Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:30:39 -0400:
>> On 06/24/2010 03:12 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>
>>>> The poll has errors in the second poll option:
>>>>
>>>>     ]] 3. Objections to the Change Proposal to require user agents
>>>>        ignore pragmas that specify multiple languages [[
>>>>
>>>> What does this refer to? FIRSTLY: We do _not_ vote about how User
>>>> Agents are supposed to behave - but what should be considered valid.
>     [...]
>>>>     ]] We have a Change Proposal to keep the current text
>     [...]
>> I've corrected the link.  It now points to this message:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0307.html
>>
>> The description of that link is taken directly from that email.
>
> Guess we still discussed UA behavior when Ian wrote that proposalů
>
> But today, it is not a fair representation of the options. And you are
> in control of what the text inside the<legend>  element.

Do you have a concrete suggestion for the title of that link?

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 21:09:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC