Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element

Maciej, you should know that, currently, if this proposal goes forward the
members of the canvas accessibility subteam believe that this proposal
should be in addition and not a replacement for the existing proposal.

Rich

Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group



From:	Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
To:	Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc:	Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>,
            HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Date:	06/24/2010 12:06 AM
Subject:	Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add
            usemap  attribute to the canvas element
Sent by:	public-html-request@w3.org




On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

      Since you think the proposal was a bad idea, there must be a counter
      proposal you can write that isn't a bad idea. Given that the proposal
      is "Add an attribute", (and assuming that it copies the sentence or
      so to give you complete explicit editing instructions to execute the
      proposal), I would expect a counter proposal that explains *why* it
      is a bad idea to document the existing behaviour of browsers in this
      way.

Are you saying that browsers actually do something when a usemap attribute
is present on the canvas element? Which browsers? Do you have a test case?

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 15:18:18 UTC