W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Fwd: Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:23:25 -0400
Message-ID: <4C22C19D.9060502@intertwingly.net>
To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 06/23/2010 09:28 PM, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
> Sam: Did you perhaps originally mean to say "To fix it in just one spec
> is, in itself, an indication that convergence is *NOT* felt to be an
> important criteria"?

Yes, and furthermore, I intended to send the correction to that effect 
(below) to the entire mailing list.

- Sam Ruby

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:41:49 -0400
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>

On 06/18/2010 03:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> I understand that Ian fixed a bug. What I don't understand (and the
> context here is the topic of convergence) is why Ian agreed to fix that
> bug, but only in the W3C copy of the spec. Either there is a problem
> with it or there is not. To fix it in just one spec is, in itself, an
> indication that convergence is felt to be an important criteria.

Correction: is *NOT* felt to be an important criteria.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 02:24:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC