W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:03:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4C2276AD.7070804@intertwingly.net>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 06/23/2010 02:30 PM, Laura Carlson wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I think/hope that I have now addressed the concerns that you have raised. I:
>
> 1. Added rationale for all changes.
> 2. Removed the reference to the paragraph-section-heading loophole, as
> Ian indeed removed it from the spec per as requested in Bug 9217.
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9217
> I just hope it doesn't reappear in the spec.
>
> In addition, I updated all three of my current proposals for Issue 31.
> So far, all together I have three proposals and possibly a fourth.
> They are:
>
> 1. Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers. January 26, 2010.
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20090126
> In this one I tried to incorporate WAI CG's advice.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/Text-Alternatives-in-HTML5
>
> 2. Require alt. Correct Definition to Provide Equality. Replace
> Guidance for Conformance Checkers. May 04, 2010. (makes alt and src
> attributes equivalent.)
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20100504
> In this one I tried to address Vlad Alexander concerns.
> http://rebuildingtheweb.com/en/correct-img-element-definition/
>
> 3. Require alt Ala HTML4. Replace img Definition and Guidance for
> Conformance Checkers. May 10, 2010.
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=ChangeProposals/ImgElement20100510
> In this one I tried to address Jonas and T.V Raman's concerns.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010May/0186.html
>
> Could you please enter 2 and 3 above into the Change Proposal Status
> spreadsheet?
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-031

Done.

> Sam, if I need to do anything else to make these proposals worthy of
> consideration, please let me know.

Will re-review after the next time we consider this issue.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 21:04:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC