W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006220800490.12376@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> I understand that Ian fixed a bug.  What I don't understand (and the
> context here is the topic of convergence) is why Ian agreed to fix that
> bug, but only in the W3C copy of the spec.

I made the change only in the W3C version because I believe it's a bad
change, but did not believe it was bad enough to argue against.


> Either there is a problem with it or there is not. To fix it in just
> one spec is, in itself, an indication that convergence is felt to be
> an important criteria.

Fair enough. Since I feel, as you do, that convergence is an important
criteria, I've done as you suggest and reverted the change from the
W3C copy.

HTH,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 08:07:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:10 GMT