On 15.06.2010 18:14, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... >> If you go back to the original thread, several alternative documents were mentioned (see<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0103.html>), which would be equally acceptable and available online. > > Julian - ECMA-006 was mentioned, are there other options you would consider acceptable? > ... I'm not aware of any besides ECMA/ISONASI, but that doesn't mean there aren't any. The reason a bug was raised is that RFC 1345 is unmaintained, and not a *definition* of US-ASCII. Just replace the citation with something that is. Best regards, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 22:55:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT