W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Request for editing guidance

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:57:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4C115FB0.6010305@intertwingly.net>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On 06/10/2010 05:49 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch>  wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> So basically you are admitting that the chairs' WG decisions are in fact
>> based purely on volume of complaints on a case-by-case basis and not on
>> any consistent technical grounds.
>
> I'm not sure you can logically conclude "purely", however IIRC the
> chairs have multiple times noted the criteria of "raises the least
> objections" as one of the considerations when there are multiple
> options being considered. (I don't have a citation - just off the top
> of my head from memory from this list - chairs please feel encouraged
> to correct me if you feel that statement is inaccurate).

Citation:

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#managing-dissent

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:57:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC