- From: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:56:48 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 09.06.2010 13:34, Charles McCathieNevile wrote in reply to Ian Hickson: > I suggest: > > "Where the working group disagrees with the editor, implement the working > group's decisions. Do not attempt to undercut those decisions by further > editorial shenanigans". Is it just me who feels offended by Ian's lack of respect towards the W3C, the HTML WG, and the process of consensus? I find this behavior unprofessional and intolerable: "Eh, I just find it amusing... HTML5 still lives happily at whatwg.org/html unaffected by the politics! :-)" [1,2] How long will the W3C tolerate a parallel, conflicting version of the spec where the editor is ignoring and publicly mocking the W3C working group's decisions? Regards, Martin [1] http://twitter.com/Hixie/status/9004127198 [2] Snapshot: http://flic.kr/p/88Y3UB
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 13:57:23 UTC