W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: preparing WG publication

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:59:16 +0200
To: "'Edward O'Connor'" <hober0@gmail.com>, "Simpson, Grant Leyton" <glsimpso@indiana.edu>, "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Larry Masinter" <masinter@adobe.com>, "Carl Cargill" <cargill@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <op.vd0qw2gu64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:23:45 +0200, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>  
wrote:
>> The WHATWG version has several features through the use of JavaScript  
>> that the W3C version lacks.
>>
> That's a specific representation of the standard, not the actual  
> normative text of the standard.   Because the actual normative text is  
> the approved W3C version, we can't be pointing people to some other  
> non-normative work.

Sure we can. W3C already does that too, for things as single-page  
versions, translations, et cetera. Pointing to a version with JavaScript  
annotations and a way to report bugs, as well as having clickable  
definitions for backreferences, fits that line.


>> It also has a much better license.
>
> That is your opinion, not a fact.

Fair enough.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 06:00:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT