- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:56:14 +0200
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, 'Leif Halvard Silli' <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, 'Laura Carlson' <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, 'Shelley Powers' <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
John Foliot, Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:45:33 -0700 (PDT): > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> I wasn't aware that there was any particular need to assert that this >> portion of the spec would continue to be edited like every other >> portion of the spec. > > +1 -1 [ Snip ] You are debating against a straw man. I did not say that anything was "necessary" according to process. I suggested a way through which you could have gained more support for your change proposal: ]] >>> The need to continue to discus<figure>,<details> etc was not expressed in the counter-proposal. If it had been expressed there, then not only would it have lowered the ad-hominen smack of the whole counter-proposal effort, it could also have lead to more support for it. [[ -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 16:56:49 UTC