W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:06:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4C07B6EA.7030204@intertwingly.net>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 06/03/2010 08:56 AM, Laura Carlson wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
>> There is a transition plan that applies to all work here:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#degrade-gracefully
>
> Are the design principles used in decision criteria? They do not
> have consensus of the working group.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-html-design-principles-20071126/#sotd
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/dprv/results

Fair enough.

A plan exists, albeit one without consensus.

Still, plan or no plan, the point is that a single identified
incompatibility has the potential to be a strong objection.

> Thanks.
>
> Best regards, Laura

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 14:07:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT