W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:36:42 -0500
Message-ID: <4C06F91A.3050303@burningbird.net>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 06/02/2010 06:03 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>> I'm not speaking for Larry, but I read the phrase "I'm not *strongly*
>> opposed..." to be about the concept of this type of element, not the
>> specific element.
>>
>> In other words, my read is he's not adverse to this type of element
>> being in the spec, BUT if what we have in the spec now is controversial,
>> or will inhibit interoperability, then remove it should be removed. Not
>> to do so could impede progress on the spec, if not now, then later.
>
> Let's break that down.  Note: this is an analysis of your 
> interpretation of Larry's words, not Larry's words itself.


No, let's not.

The only point I wanted to make is that Larry's use of "I'm not strongly 
opposed..." was taken out of context.

Any other interpretation of what he wrote is between you and him. 
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 00:37:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC