W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2010

Re: comments on 'private use' section of proposal - Sanity check

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:33:04 +0100
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B4F431CC-2252-45B0-B61B-2D14CC9EE525@googlemail.com>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
On 19 Jul 2010, at 08:29, Steven Faulkner wrote:
> But unless the tool allows me to add an alternative text (and this may be a simple as being able to edit the source html), the only conforming documents with an image i can produce are those that are meant for people who are known to be able to view and understand the content of the image.

That's true. :) Given we want tools to allow and encourage users to add alternative text, is that a problem?

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 07:33:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:03 UTC