- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:28:39 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Le 22 janv. 2010 à 22:39, Karl Dubost a écrit : > Le 22 janv. 2010 à 11:43, Julian Reschke a écrit : >> this issue has been raised before, and I realize that this is the way Ian likes to specify things. Anyway, I just came across: >> >> "Two origins are said to be the same origin if the following algorithm returns true: > > Maybe the spec verbosity can be clarified with graphics. > I tried the one you were pointing out without being sure to have made the right rendering. > > http://www.la-grange.net/2010/01/22/same-origin-algorithm.png [23:24] <TabAtkins> karlcow: Yeah, it's wrong. The opaque-identifier portion should completely separate from the same-components section. If they're opaque, they don't *have* components. [23:25] <karlcow> TabAtkins: ah. I'll modify. It is not clear in the prose of the spec I have the feeling. [23:25] * karlcow likes to visualize to understand [23:26] <TabAtkins> If you translate it from prose directly to if/then code in your favorite programming language, it becomes very clear. ^_^
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2010 04:28:46 UTC