W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:39:25 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Philip Jägenstedt" <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <PM-GA.20100121223925.54445.3.1D@semsol.com>

Heh, yes, you just said it in a much more compact way than I did.

thx,
bnj

On 21.01.2010 15:26:39, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
>> I misunderstood what you were trying to do. Can you outline the steps needed
>> to get the triples in your example? If you start out with
>> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person, name and img, would you HTTP GET
>> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person, hope to find an RDF Schema and find within
>> it something relating to "name" and "img"? As far as I can see
>> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person redirects to an HTML page that uses RDFa to
>> encode the RDF schema.
>
>If I'm reading correctly, he's assuming that, by chopping off the last
>part of the itemtype url, one then obtains a prefix which you can
>append individual itemprop names to and get a valid url for rdf.
>Apparently the common practice with RDF url structures makes this
>fairly reliable.
>
>(I know nothing about common url-structuring practices in the RDF
>communities, and I may be misinterpreting Ben in the first place.)
>
>~TJ
>
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 21:39:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:00 GMT