W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions)

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:17:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4B586213.9080406@lachy.id.au>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> So it sounds like no one else has strong feelings. I therefore
> suggest  that Ian should implement the fcaption/dlabel Change Proposal:
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDtFcaptionDlabel
>
> I think it would be fine to pick either of<fcaption>  or<figcaption>,
> and either of<dlabel>  or<dsummary>. Once that change is made, the
> Chairs will post a Call for Consensus to close this issue by amicable
> resolution.

Just to be clear, does this mean you're ruling out the other alternative 
of using <summary>, as mentioned in the change proposal, or is the 
choice between dlabel, dsummary and summary being left entirely to the 
editor's discretion?

-- 
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 14:18:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:13 UTC