W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66

From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:52:02 +0000
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <104E6B5B6535E849970CDFBB1C5216EB1D09E408@TK5EX14MBXC140.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Wednesday, January 20, 2010 6:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I haven't seen any follow-up discussion. I'm interested in hearing what
> the rest of the Working Group thinks. Does anyone strongly agree with
> Matt that the sentence he objects to should be removed? Does anyone
> strongly feel that the sentence should be retained? Does anyone have
> alternate wording to suggest that might be acceptable to everyone?
> 
> My own feeling is that I don't care much either way. I'd like to see
> whether anyone else in the Working Group has an opinion on this issue
> before we decide how to proceed.

I agree with Matt. I've not seen any demand for the image analysis feature in any of the scenario planning we've done. Further, if AT vendors determine that such analysis is effective for improving accessibility, they don't need permission from the HTML5 spec to implement such functionality. I don't believe there is value in the spec discussing this topic.

Cheers,

Adrian.
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 06:54:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:00 GMT