Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))

On Jan 20, 2010, at 13:50, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> What most people will be interested in is what the W3 Validator 
> considers valid.

Indeed, it probably a more relevant consideration for many than what the specs say.

> b) if you do go for an 
> extension, make sure that it can be W3 validated = best thing is to 
> submit the spec to the W3.

That probably helps. However, it seems that it's neither necessary (Atom validation is offered) nor sufficient (XForms validation is not offered).

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 12:57:06 UTC