Re: text/sandboxed-html

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Adam Barth wrote:
>> We might want to support something like Content-Security-Policies in
>> the future, so an extensible set of flags seems like a good idea.  I'm
>> not sure we should design the API on this list, but you could imagine
>> wanting to know which flags the plug-in supports instead of just
>> having a single "supports sandboxing" bit.
>
> Would a whitespace-separated list of tokens work? (similar to what
> iframe/@sandbox takes)

I'm not overly familiar with the style of NPAPI.  That seems
reasonable.  Some sort of bit field might also be reasonable.  The
plugin-futures folks are the experts here.

Adam

Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 18:34:43 UTC