W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:08:23 -0500
Message-Id: <2B5CC759-36C1-4575-9FA4-118B84D95E96@la-grange.net>
Cc: "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>

Le 14 janv. 2010 à 17:54, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
> The semantic meaning of the hidden attribute carries the semantic
> meaning that the element itself, and its descendents are irrelevant.
> I.e. that the semantic meaning of the document are as if those
> elements aren't there. 

What a search engine should do?
What a wysiwyg authoring tool should do?


Le 15 janv. 2010 à 05:46, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
> The hidden attribute is *not* appropriate for the use case of hiding stuff from the visual rendering only. The hidden attribute is meant to mark a DOM subtree pruned from all presentations on all media.

In this case, what about

	domhidden
	pruned
	domremoved
	domcut


-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2010 00:08:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:12 UTC