W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:09:32 -0800
Cc: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <50F1462B-C8D0-439B-B944-90410B44DB17@apple.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>

On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> Joe D Williams, Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:25:26 -0800:
>>> Joe, you did not answer my question (or perhaps I was unclear): What
>>> if the <iframe> element resides in a XHTML5 document? Does @doc then
>>> still only permit text/html content?
>>
>> If what you are asking is can you use <iframe> to import text/html
>> into a browser-hosted document defined as application/xhtml+xml, then
>> the imported stuff must obey xml and be in the default document
>> namespace or parent namespace of the iframe?
>
> May be Maciej should answer what he meant:
>
>>>>> Maciej Stachowiak, Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:52:20 -0800:
>>>
>>>>>>> The question still remains... would @doc allow SVG code, for  
>>>>>>> example?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using SVG-in-HTML, yes (since it assumes a text/html MIME type).
>>>>>> Using the traditional XML serialization of SVG, no.
>
> In the thread it was said that it would have to be text/html code. But
> I'll suppose that it was meant that  content of @doc has to have the
> the same MIME as the parent document.

I was only answering the question when the containing document is text/ 
html. I did not check what the spec says if the containing document is  
XML. As for what the behavior *should* be, I could see an argument  
either way.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 01:10:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT