W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:39:34 -0800
Cc: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <3714AB7B-5757-45B4-B7A2-0483F8E5B3EA@apple.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 20:06 +0000, Tantek Celik wrote:
>> Even TimBL is now advocating RDFa now, not RDF
>
> Perhaps being pernickety, but that's like saying that somebody is
> advocating using PNGs instead of pictures. PNGs are pictures; and RDFa
> is RDF.

Given the context of Tantek's message, I assume he was contrasting to  
RDF/XML or other standalone serializations that would constitute a  
"side file" or go in a comment.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 23:40:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT