W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: The Canvas 2D API split

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:00:37 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001110900h3cb05b69jeed4a8446b9e1336@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 10:41 -0600, Shelley Powers wrote:
>> >> Please do not enter tracker issues that aren't called for by the process.
>> >>
>> >
>> > We have to disagree, then.
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > How else are we supposed to track assignments, responsibilities, and
>> > due dates, Maciej?
>
> Nobody said that the Canvas 2D drafts were under the responsibilities of
> the HTML Working Group. As Maciej stated, the HTML Working Group never
> decided to take on the work of a separate Canvas 2D specification yet.
> You're trying to open tracker issues against documents that are not yet
> on the table which, I agree with Maciej, wasn't the right approach.
>
> Philippe
>
>
>

But the initial document from which the 2D API was split is a document
under control of this working group. How the split occurs is a concern
for us, is it not?

So who has responsibility over these two documents now, if we don't?

Shelley
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 17:01:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT