W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: New split-out drafts

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:59:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4B48FC2E.5030407@intertwingly.net>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Julian Reschke, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:53:39 +0100:
>> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> For what it's worth, I agree with Shelley that would have liked a
>>> on-list discussion regarding this too. While it can be argued that
>>> it's an editorial change only, I would be shocked and surprised if it
>>> didn't have political effects too. Effects that I'm worried is going
>>> to slow down development of the spec.
>>>
>>> Specifically the split between vocabulary and core is something that
>>> I'm worried we'll debate to death.
>> +1
> 
> +1
> 
> Ian's splits looks like a an attempt to minimize or undo the impact of 
> the fact that Microdata was split from HTML 5. The logics seems to be: 
> If Microdata can't be in, then I'll split all sections out so that they 
> all can be considered equally in/out of HTML.

Let's not speculate further.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 21:59:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT