- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:59:10 -0500
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Julian Reschke, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:53:39 +0100: >> Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> For what it's worth, I agree with Shelley that would have liked a >>> on-list discussion regarding this too. While it can be argued that >>> it's an editorial change only, I would be shocked and surprised if it >>> didn't have political effects too. Effects that I'm worried is going >>> to slow down development of the spec. >>> >>> Specifically the split between vocabulary and core is something that >>> I'm worried we'll debate to death. >> +1 > > +1 > > Ian's splits looks like a an attempt to minimize or undo the impact of > the fact that Microdata was split from HTML 5. The logics seems to be: > If Microdata can't be in, then I'll split all sections out so that they > all can be considered equally in/out of HTML. Let's not speculate further. - Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 21:59:42 UTC