- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:26:13 +0100
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8365 > > > Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |WONTFIX > > > > > --- Comment #30 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-01-09 08:54:28 --- > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: I have put the spec back to what it was like before, because the > proposed change was found to be significantly less popular and no alternative > compromise has been proposed. I'd really appreciate if we would start acting like a WG again (*), and stop the "I split it out-I put it back in" circus. 48 hours are simply not sufficient to find the best way to make a big change like that, and the fact that the first "attempt" proved unpopular doesn't prove at all it can't be done. Best regards, Julian (*) Which means discussing on *this* mailing list, not in bug trackers or IRC channels.
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 11:26:57 UTC