W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:50:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4B43A613.7050202@gmx.de>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Michael A.Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>, "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> Sure. I don't just don't see why it's different for firefox than any
> other browser. Even IE is updated fairly regularly with security
> fixes. And technically I don't see that any other couldn't do the same
> too.
> ...

It isn't different. It just happens we were discussing Firefox in the 
context of the video autobuffering issue.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:51:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:12 UTC