W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4B41DE89.4040801@gmx.de>
To: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Philip J├Ągenstedt wrote:
> ...
> Why is that not good, and how could the browser possibly know that the 
> resource is not seekable without trying to GET it?
> ...

Unless I'm missing something, aborting the connection will not cause the 
server to stop sending immediately, so both network bandwidth and server 
resources are wasted. Furthermore, dropping the connection means you 
need to establish a new one, no?

To find out about range request support, the client could do a HEAD 
request and check the Accept-Ranges response header (and yes, it's not 
required to return it, so it would be interesting to check what current 
servers do).

> ...

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 12:27:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT