W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Status of Leif's Appeal / Issue 30 Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:38:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4C6FE4D7.6070206@intertwingly.net>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
CC: 'HTMLwg WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, 'Paul Cotton' <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "'Michael(tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>
I won't comment on the portions of the email which deal with the appeal 
as that's in the capable hands of the W3C staff at this point.  I would 
like to discourage further discussion about the process on this mailing 
list as the W3C staff are well aware of their responsibilities.

On 08/19/2010 04:26 PM, John Foliot wrote:
>
> Previously I had
> signaled an intent to file a Formal Objection, and I am wondering if that
> still would be the appropriate next step for me, given that I have (what I
> believe to be) new facts to be considered.

I'll note that these are not mutually exclusive actions.

If you have new facts to bring forward, you may do so at any time. 
Should you do so, I would encourage you to explain you believe that 
these facts are relevant to ISSUE-30, and explain why this information 
was not available at the time of the decision. Ideally, these facts 
should be specific and be accompanied by supporting evidence. This 
doesn't have to be stated as an appeal; just information.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 21 August 2010 14:38:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 August 2010 14:38:47 GMT