W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:51:08 +0200
Message-ID: <4BDAE04C.4040406@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On 29.04.2010 10:31, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
>> I also note that the current text got objections from both Roy and me,
>> and Dan was proposing to make the citations more specific (which I
>> supported).
>
> What we're looking for now (were, actually, the deadline has now passed)
> is for people who object to closing the issue without prejudice, rather
> than people who object to the details of the text. As acknowledged in
> the CfC, we know some people would like more extensive changes, but we
> believe there has been more than adequate time to express other points
> of view in the form of a Change Proposal.
> ...

I have opened bug <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9627>, 
"be more specific in external references" -- this applies not only to 
the case that Dan mentioned, but to many other sections in the spec. (So 
we can discuss it separately from ISSUE-81).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 13:51:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT