W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

ISSUE-27, was: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:54:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4BD98F94.6000904@gmx.de>
To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On 20.04.2010 21:39, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 20.04.2010 21:07, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> What is the current status of the registry needed for ISSUE-27
>> (rel-ownership [1]) resolution?
>
> Nothing changed; the Internet Draft still is on the IESG agenda for this
> Thursday:
>
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/>
> ...

Hi,

here's a quick update: the IESG discussed this last Thursday, and there 
are few ongoing discussions about the registry prodecure/requirements, 
and the way the old Atom link relation types are carried over.

See 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/#ballot> 
for the details.

It's hard to predict exactly how long it will take to proceed; it 
appears that minimally a new draft will need to be submitted that 
addresses some of the questions that were asked.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:55:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT