W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:27:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4BD950E9.3090603@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On 29.04.2010 11:09, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> On 29.04.2010 10:31, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> Do you object to the Call for Consensus to close this issue without
>>> prejudice? If so, are you volunteering to do the work you think is
>>> needed?
>>> ...
>>
>> Yes, I do object. Can we please discuss the contradiction between what
>> Ian said and what the spec now says and not pretend we're done?
>
> Why is the apparent contradiction between Ian's mailing list statements
> and what the spec says of interest to the Working Group? Our interest is
> in the contents of the spec, not the contents of people's emails. Will
> this line of discussion lead to a proposed change to the draft?

I'd like to understand Ian's point of view. If there's no additional 
information the "right" way to verify the proposed text is to analyze 
all usages of "resource" in the spec, and that's very time-consuming. 
Therefore it would be very helpful to hear back from the editor.

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:27:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:17 UTC