W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:22:22 +0200
Message-ID: <4BD941BE.7080804@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 29.04.2010 07:08, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> The Chairs would like to proceed towards resolving this issue. We have
> the following proposals submitted:
>
> Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
> accessibility.
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
> (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)
>
> Change Proposal: There is no problem and the proposed remedy is to
> change nothing.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0194.html
>
> Change Proposal: Include more detail about possible image repair
> techniques.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0195.html
>
> I'd like to check whether we are close to consensus on any of these
> options. If so, we will seek amicable resolution. If not, then the
> chairs will likely proceed to resolve the issue by other means, such as
> via survey.
> ...

I support

 > Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
 > accessibility.
 > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
 > (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:23:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:17 UTC