W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-107 Change Proposal: Replace <object> fallback example

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:57:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4BD0D464.7040709@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On 23.04.2010 00:04, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> On 22.04.2010 14:15, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> This is an alternate change proposal for ISSUE-107.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Thanks Lachlan.
>>>
>>> Chairs: I think this is superior to my original proposal; should I retract
>>> that?
>>
>> If no one prefers your original, then sure.
>>
>> At this point I'd ask: does anyone object to Lachlan's alternative?
>
> I would be happy to add the example Lachlan proposes. I object to removing
> the example being discussed. There are a number of examples of<object>  in
> the spec, covering a variety of different ways of giving fallback:
> ...

It is a change proposal to *replace* the current example. Adding this as 
a new example will not address the problems that have been pointed out 
with the existing text.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:58:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:17 UTC