W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-90 figure, ISSUE-91 aside, ISSUE-93 details, ISSUE-95 hidden, ISSUE-96 progress, and ISSUE-97 meter

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:34:27 -0700
Cc: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <8D242AF0-0074-4878-B682-471DA960D33F@apple.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>

On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>  
>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Several of us have written a zero-edit Change Proposal to keep the
>> various new elements, attributes, and controls that are up for
>> deletion. You can find our Change Proposal on the WG wiki here:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements
>> It's good to see some specifics. I appreciate you all taking the time
>> to respond to my change proposals.
>> Co-Chairs, I ask for some time to respond to this counter-proposal.
>> I'm assuming that the May 6th deadline is still viable for
>> counter-proposals. May I have until that time to modify my change
>> proposals to answer the issues raised in this counter-proposal?
>> We're not going to cut conversation off before everyone has had a  
>> fair
>> chance to revise their proposals.
>> However, since we're not expecting additional alternate proposals or
>> counter-proposals, now seems a fine time to start discussion.
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
> Folks can discuss if they wish. I would rather make adjustments in my
> change proposals in order to respond to new issues raised with this
> change proposal. Frankly, I don't feel comfortable in participating in
> discussions in this group.
> Additionally, just because you're not expecting any other
> counter-proposals doesn't mean there won't be any. You have recorded a
> specific date for such counter-proposals. I suggest you honor the
> date. These items have been treated irregularly from the beginning. I
> would hope for some consistency at some time in the process.

Hi Shelley,

If you look at the issue status page you can see that I did not remove  
any of the May 6th deadlines. Example: <http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-091 
 >. All I'm saying is that the floor is now open for email discussion,  
if anyone has new information to add.

Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:35:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC