W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-90 figure, ISSUE-91 aside, ISSUE-93 details, ISSUE-95 hidden, ISSUE-96 progress, and ISSUE-97 meter

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:31:05 -0500
Message-ID: <m2q643cc0271004220531k50953226u1a9c3a60c0bf0f28@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Several of us have written a zero-edit Change Proposal to keep the
>>
>> various new elements, attributes, and controls that are up for
>>
>> deletion. You can find our Change Proposal on the WG wiki here:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements
>>
>>
>> It's good to see some specifics. I appreciate you all taking the time
>> to respond to my change proposals.
>>
>> Co-Chairs, I ask for some time to respond to this counter-proposal.
>> I'm assuming that the May 6th deadline is still viable for
>> counter-proposals. May I have until that time to modify my change
>> proposals to answer the issues raised in this counter-proposal?
>>
>> We're not going to cut conversation off before everyone has had a fair
>> chance to revise their proposals.
>> However, since we're not expecting additional alternate proposals or
>> counter-proposals, now seems a fine time to start discussion.
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>
> Folks can discuss if they wish. I would rather make adjustments in my
> change proposals in order to respond to new issues raised with this
> change proposal. Frankly, I don't feel comfortable in participating in
> discussions in this group.
>
> Additionally, just because you're not expecting any other
> counter-proposals doesn't mean there won't be any. You have recorded a
> specific date for such counter-proposals. I suggest you honor the
> date. These items have been treated irregularly from the beginning. I
> would hope for some consistency at some time in the process.
>
> Shelley
>

And evidently, you've also modified the Decision Policy in the meantime.

It seems that the co-chairs no longer make decisions based on the
strengths of the arguments, or the rationales given. From the Decision
Policy, it would seem now that the decisions are based on popularity
in polls, and votes.

So, it doesn't matter what I say.

Shelley
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:31:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT