W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-82 profile-disambiguation by amicable resolution

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:24:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4BCEA81C.9070204@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 21.04.2010 08:51, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
>> For the first one I may be opening a bug later on, the second one
>> seems to be an oversight as the IDL attribute isn't there anymore.
>
> Filing a bug later on the first is fine, if you choose to do so.

Will do.

> On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:44 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> On 21.04.2010 08:33, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> Right, but DOM Level 2 HTML did include it.
>>
>> I do not disagree with the statement that's left, but now it really
>> lacks context; it's a "Note:" without any text it refers to. Maybe one
>> sentence needs to be added stating what you just said.
>
> If this isn't a blocker for ISSUE-82, perhaps that could be a separate
> bug as well? I'm willing to file it, it does seem worth clarifying that
> the note is there because attribute was in previous specs.

As much as I'd like to close ISSUE-82, this is really a problem caused 
by the suggested change. We really should fix it.

So *if* we have consensus that the spec doesn't define the IDL attribute 
we consequently should also drop comments about it (yes, I just changed 
my mind on that).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:24:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT