W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-82 (Profile-Disambiguation), was: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:28:53 -0700
Message-ID: <r2t63df84f1004191328o3541dc0fhd7c5e4edc46a1f7d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm happy to remove it if browser vendors remove support. My only
>> > > > concern is with removing it but having all the browsers continue
>> > > > to support it. I understand there's a patch for Mozilla to remove
>> > > > it already? If so, then that's enough for me.
>> > >
>> > > Mozilla patch is here:
>> > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518110#c2>
>> > >
>> > > My expectation is that the WebKit project would be willing to remove
>> > > it if Mozilla successfully removes it and does not find serious
>> > > compat problems.
>> >
>> > Yup, the patch is ready and I expect it to get reviewed and landed any
>> > day with no objections.
>>
>> Ian, given that the patch is ready, are you ready to remove this text?
>
> I have removed the "profile" IDL attribute from the definition of the
> HTMLHeadElement interface.

On a related note, I just landed[1] removing said attribute from
firefox. I also removed the HTMLBaseFontInterface while I was at it.

I'm happy to report that in the 5 minutes since the patch landed we
haven't had a single report of websites breaking ;-)

Seriously though, if I hear of any problems I'll report it back here.

[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3a2552c83446

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 20:29:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT