W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE 86 and removing atom transform section - focusing

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:15:08 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, sroussey@network54.com, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <AF798DA1-5EE9-4972-AFC5-CE1232AE6030@apple.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Apr 17, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> Sorry; I agree with the sentiment, but don't think that this falls
> into that bucket.  I'm not holding something up "until Last Call", I'm
> holding it up because I think it can be resolved in a better way, and
> there is active discussion underway involving that resolution.  My
> sentiment was just that I'm willing to give it up, even with that
> discussion, if you guys think we're otherwise close to LC.
> So, rather than "can we delay resolving this until it becomes a
> problem", I'm saying "I'm okay with cutting resolution short if it
> becomes a problem".

If we can get consensus on a different solution, that's fine, so long  
as the solution is in a matter of weeks, not months. Right now, it  
seems like "remove Atom conversion" is the proposal that is closest to  
consensus, but I do see the other proposals getting at least some  

Received on Sunday, 18 April 2010 01:15:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC