W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE 86 and removing atom transform section - focusing

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:08:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4BC98883.4020304@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, sroussey@network54.com, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 17.04.2010 11:43, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 2:40 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> In the meantime I posted about more problems with the algorithm and
>> didn't get any feedback
>> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0500.html).
>> Do I need to open a new bug?
>
> If you want to be guaranteed a reply, then yes. Ideally more than one
> bug if you are reporting multiple problems. Or you could wait to see if
> the algorithm gets removed, in which case any such bugs would presumably
> be redundant.

The bug will be continue to be relevant if the algorithm isn't removed 
from that "other" spec as well. It won't just be relevant to the HTML WG 
anymore, true.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 17 April 2010 10:09:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:07 GMT