W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:39:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4BC627F2.3020909@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 14.04.2010 21:58, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Given that discussion has died down, and that this proposal has gotten
>> several indications of support and (as of yet) no objections, at this
>> time I would like anybody in the Working Group that has reason to object
>> to this item to state so now.  If none come forward, the chairs will
>> issue a Call for Consensus.
> If the W3C HTML WG does not want to define a mapping from HTML to Atom,
> then I'm happy to remove it from the W3C copy of the spec. However, the
> text would remain in the WHATWG copy as the WHATWG has received feedback
> asking for such a mapping to be defined, and defining one seems harmless.

In which case I recommend that you seek the feedback of the Atom 
community, and fix potential bugs in the spec (such as thise described 
in my first change proposal, but there may be more).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 20:40:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC