W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:52:02 +1000
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <819C814E-4727-440F-85E0-6D13231C20D4@mnot.net>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
This was driven by requests from HTML5 folks, who felt that it made the algorithm too complex and error-prone.

If your application needs to consider registered types as URIs, there's nothing stopping it from using a URI prefix as a name space; e.g., that of the registry.

Cheers,


On 09/04/2010, at 4:34 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 10:10 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt
> 
> I can't believe I've only just noticed this, but: registered link types
> are no longer URIs?! That sucks!
> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 01:52:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:16 UTC