W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Change definition of URL to normatively reference IRI specification using a well-defined interface

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:32:01 -0700
To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Marc Blanchet'" <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "'Ted Hardie'" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'Paul Cotton'" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Michel SUIGNARD" <Michel@suignard.com>, "'public-html'" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003101cad6f5$f951f530$ebf5df90$@org>
There has been some discussion in the HTML working group over how to
get changes into the IRI spec in IETF, specifically with requirements
for a better interface for some processing.


  “If we can get agreement to provide an interface roughly similar to
what Ian proposed…”


Honestly, I thought the IRIBIS document actually had what is being
asked for here. So I’d like someone else to look & see if they can
figure out what’s not there that needs to be there, or make specific


> I'd really really like to hear from Larry or one of the other IRIbis
editors whether this basic approach is acceptable


As far as process issues in IRIBIS, please check with the chairs, who
are currently Ted Hardie and Marc Blanchet for authoritative answers. 


My current belief is that the IETF IRI WG will  IETF tracker at
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1, and that the chairs will
use the tracker to drive discussion and resolution. 


As one of the three editors of one of the documents, I certainly have
no problem with the basic approach, which is what I thought I was
accomplishing already.





Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 08:32:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC