W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-04-01: action items, decision policy update, issue status

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:43:05 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <7B79B510-BD32-4BB2-9399-C8101C958937@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 03.04.2010 00:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 02.04.2010 22:41, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Even if these documents do not actually affect the registration, I  
>>> think
>>> they are still a problem. It seems like a bad idea to have  
>>> documents,
>>> whether WG Notes or RECs, that claim things about text/html which  
>>> are in
>>> not accordance with the MIME registration, and which are not going  
>>> to be
>>> submitted to IANA. That seems likely to create confusion.
>>> ...
>> Absolutely.
>> I just wanted to clarify what just publishing a doc in W3C spec  
>> doesn't
>> change the media type. The IANA needs to be told as well.
>> ...
> Maybe we can add this topic to tomorrow's agenda again? It would be  
> great if somebody who knows could actually report about what exactly  
> is going on (what's the document that was mentioned? what is its  
> status?).

The Chairs are expecting a status update on this by next week's telecon.

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:43:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:07 GMT