W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:12:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4BBC4C8D.2070902@gmx.de>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24.03.2010 05:55, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>
>>> - That being said, I think a reference to ISO/IEC 646 would be
>>> acceptable as well; this one is re-published by ECMA as ECMA-006,
>>> which is available online
>>> (<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-006.htm>)
>>
>> Ian, would a reference to ISO/IEC 646 aka ECMA-006 be acceptable to you?
>
> I think debating this is a waste of our time and am not willing to get
> drawn into a discussion of the topic.
 > ...

I read that as "no".

This was two weeks ago. Can we please finally have a call for counter 
proposals, or move directly to a call for consensus?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:13:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:16 UTC