Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark III)

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> > The same change proposal also suggests a second change, namely to 
> > change the syntax to allow multiple comma-separated language codes, 
> > even though all but the first would be ignored.
> 
> Actually, this is not what the spec says, is it? The spec says that 
> every time the content attribute contains a comma separated list of 
> language tags, then the content attribute contains a comma character, 
> and would be ignored?

Oh, yes, good point. I forgot we changed that recently (in response to 
i18n feedback, IIRC). It doesn't affect the points made by the change 
proposal, though, only a few of the side details.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'