W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark III)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004070530030.2348@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> > The same change proposal also suggests a second change, namely to 
> > change the syntax to allow multiple comma-separated language codes, 
> > even though all but the first would be ignored.
> Actually, this is not what the spec says, is it? The spec says that 
> every time the content attribute contains a comma separated list of 
> language tags, then the content attribute contains a comma character, 
> and would be ignored?

Oh, yes, good point. I forgot we changed that recently (in response to 
i18n feedback, IIRC). It doesn't affect the points made by the change 
proposal, though, only a few of the side details.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 05:39:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC