W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark II)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:35:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4BB77C6D.5040405@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On 03.04.2010 18:17, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>
>> Ian Hickson, Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC):
>> []
>>> RATIONALE
>> []
>>> The same change proposal also suggests a second change, namely to change
>>> the syntax to allow multiple comma-separated language codes, even though
>>> all but the first would be ignored.
>>>
>>> User agents do not pay any attention to values after the first.
>>
>> Incorrect: Except Mozilla browsers (which looks at *all* the language
>> tags in the list), user agents do not pay attention to <meta>
>> content-language at all when it contains a comma-separated list.
>
> Do you have a test case that demonstrates this? Seems like that would be
> a useful addition to the discussion.

I agree that to see a test case would be nice.

That being said, that should apply to Ian's original claim as well, right?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 17:36:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:16 UTC