W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-04-01: action items, decision policy update, issue status

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:32:08 +0200
Message-ID: <4BB67068.3090506@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 02.04.2010 22:41, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
> Even if these documents do not actually affect the registration, I think
> they are still a problem. It seems like a bad idea to have documents,
> whether WG Notes or RECs, that claim things about text/html which are in
> not accordance with the MIME registration, and which are not going to be
> submitted to IANA. That seems likely to create confusion.
> ...

Absolutely.

I just wanted to clarify what just publishing a doc in W3C spec doesn't 
change the media type. The IANA needs to be told as well.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 22:33:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:16 UTC