W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-96 Change Proposal

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:14:41 -0600
Message-ID: <p2i643cc0271004011314jf04b343dxb4503793e01de460@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>
>> This discussion is become circular, evidently most people disagree
>> with me. That's fine. I don't agree, but will take my arguments
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> Most of my proposals were about removing these so-called "semantic
>> elements". If the co-chairs want to close these proposals, since no
>> one agrees with me, that's fine too.
>
> The Chairs are very much interested in seeing the level of support or
> opposition for this proposal, and the other similar proposals for removing
> elements. That would be useful feedback for determining the next action.
>
> So far, my read on this discussion is that a number of people disagree with
> the proposal, some have expressed concerns without taking a firm stance, and
> no one besides Shelley has voiced support. So far, I have not seen direct
> comments on the other proposals.
>
> We will be monitoring the ongoing discussion.

That's OK, too. When will the co-chairs let me know if I need to make
any edits to the change proposals? We already know that Issue 94 is
being closed out. I'm assuming the others are still living, though.

>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>

Shelley
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 20:15:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:07 GMT