W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:47:09 -0400
Message-ID: <4BB3ED0D.8050307@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/31/2010 08:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> Ooh, maybe we can adopt as resolution to ISSUE-94 a WG decision that
>> these things should be split out, and that this will happen as soon as
>> there is an editor for the separate spec. But that if no such editor
>> steps up by the time we reach CR then the split will not happen for
>> this version of HTML.
>>
>> Would that be an acceptable solution to everyone?
>
[snip]
>
> Let's say we handled it that way. This would be more or less equivalent
> to recording the issue as closed without prejudice. "Closed without
> prejudice" means we will not treat the issue as a blocker for Last Call,
> but will give it due consideration if anyone comes forward with a
> concrete proposal before CR.
>
> I would be hesitant to record something more specific, such as that the
> WG will definitely agree to the split if certain conditions are met.

+1

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 00:48:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:16 UTC